Live match video, inside your own page
The stream is the thing users came for — and the thing that sends them somewhere else when you do not have it. This puts licensed match video in your interface, beside your odds and your bet slip, instead of in a tab you do not own.
A player, not a project
The block drops into a match page or live centre. No ingest, no transcoding, no CDN bill of your own.
Iframe or widget
Two ways in, both a single tag. Which one you want usually depends on your CSP, not your layout.
Next to the money
Video in the same viewport as markets and statistics, so watching and betting are not separate sessions.
Priced per sport
Take the one sport that carries your traffic, or the whole catalogue once it does not.
It stops the tab from opening
A user who leaves to find a stream is gone for the length of the match, and the market they were looking at settles without them. Keeping the picture on your page is worth more than the picture itself.
Longer live sessions
Time on page follows the match rather than the click, which is the metric live sections are judged on.
One place to look
Picture, price and slip in one viewport — the in-play bet gets made where the user already is.
Works on the phone
Portrait layouts and in-app webviews included, since that is where live traffic actually arrives.
What is available, sport by sport
Coverage is a rights question, so it varies by sport, by competition and by territory. Tell us the markets you sell into and we will tell you what is actually clearable before you plan a section around it.
Football
The deepest catalogue and the one most sections are built around — leagues, cups and a long regional tail.
Basketball
Fast enough that the delay between picture and price matters, which is why the player sits inside the card.
Tennis
Long matches and heavy in-play volume — the sport where a stream keeps a session alive for hours.
Cricket
Decisive in South Asian markets, where a live section without cricket video is a section people leave.
Hockey
Short bursts of action and frequent price moves; the picture earns its place in the event card.
Everything else
Volleyball, baseball, rugby, handball, table tennis — ask, and we will check the rights for your territory.
Who this is for
Nobody buys this to watch football. It is bought by the people who own the page other people watch football on — and who would rather that page were theirs. Where you start depends on your fixture mix, not on your budget: one sport answers the question, the full package answers it for everything.
- Betting websites
- Live-score projects
- Sports media
- Prediction services
- Mobile apps
- Analytics dashboards
How the integration goes
The page leads customers to a simple choice: buy sports video streams for a website, select one sport for testing, or connect the full monthly streaming package. Installation is done as a widget or iframe.
Name the markets
Which sports, which competitions, which countries your users are in. Rights are decided at that level.
Place the player
Event card, live centre or a dedicated match page — we will say which one your layout can carry.
Watch the numbers
Start on one sport and compare live session length before and after. The answer shows up within a week.
Buy sports video streams for your website
One sport is the honest way to test whether video changes anything on your site. The full package makes sense once several sports are carrying live traffic and buying them separately stops being cheaper.
Enough to find out whether a live section earns its space.
- 1 selected sport
- Live match video streams
- Widget or iframe for a test launch
- Integration assistance
For a live listing broad enough that one sport is not the question.
- Football, basketball, tennis, cricket, hockey and the long tail
- Maximum live match coverage
- Match video streams for betting websites
- Personal support
The questions that come up
What video is worth, and what it costs
Live video is the most requested feature on a betting site and the one most often postponed, for a good reason: it is the only part of the product priced by somebody else. Rights are sold per competition and per territory, they are renegotiated on their own schedule, and no amount of engineering makes a match available in a country where it is not licensed.
So the useful conversation is not whether you can have video. It is which competitions matter to the users you actually have, which of those are clearable where they live, and what the section shows on everything else. That last part is where most plans quietly fail — a live page that only works for the top fixtures teaches users to look elsewhere for the rest.
Our answer is to run video and the match tracker side by side. Where the picture is available, it plays in the event card. Where it is not, the tracker draws the match from the same feed that prices it — no rights, no territory, no gap in the listing. The user sees one consistent live section instead of a patchwork.
On price, the split is deliberate. A single sport costs little enough to be a test rather than a commitment, and the full package only starts making sense once several sports carry live traffic. If you are not sure which side of that line you are on, tell us your markets and your fixture mix and we will say so plainly.